Showing posts with label Sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sexism. Show all posts

Monday, June 30, 2014

Celebrate a New Week with Gender Equality

          Happy Monday, everyone! Pride month is drawing to a close, but it's been a pretty great one this year. I know that Mondays are kinda rough for some people, so I'm cheering you all up with a cool comic that perfectly embodies the true spirit of gender equality. 
          Here's the link to the original imgur page, but I'm also including the image below. It's kinda big, but it's worth the read.
          Remember, sexism isn't a "men's issue" or a "women's issue". Sexism affects everyone negatively, although I do have to admit that women have it kinda worse. (Femicide, anyone?) However, the stereotypes that claim that men always have to be interested in the same things, act the same way, and not express emotion are ridiculous and incredibly harmful. All in all, I agree with the message of this image- Sexism will not be overcome until both women and men can recognize it as a serious issue that hurts both groups, and work together.
          Have a great and world-improving week!

 

Update: I can't seem to get the image to be at a good size for reading that doesn't fall out of my post, so you can either zoom in your browser to view it here, or view the original on imgur. If anyone knows how to fix the issue, please shoot me a comment to let me know! Blogger needs to add some more features... 


Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Food for Thought: Abandoned Innocents

          On the night of April 14th, 2014, almost 300 Nigerian schoolgirls from the village of Chibok were kidnapped by Boko Haram, an Islamist terrorist organization. I did not write an article about this event.
          Why am I writing about it now, two months “late”? Well, even though the entire media was in an uproar about it in April, I haven't heard a word about these girls for many weeks- not from news organizations, not from open-source websites, and not from human lips. Are the young scholars still missing? Yes. Are they still being kept as sex-slaves and many being indoctrinated into Islamism against their will? Yes. Does the public still care? Not really.

          After two months of imprisonment, surely these girls have given up hope. If I were among them, I would have. Despite a twitter campaign, empty promises from the government, and many people claiming that "I won't be able to rest until the victims are returned home", the world has forgotten about them already. I suppose that shows exactly how much Western society cares about people who are only an ocean away- and yet, an ocean is enough to separate the lamented from the forgotten, the rescued from the abandoned, and the saved from the damned. 

Image credit to ABC News





Sources: www.cnn.com, videos released by the Boko Haram terrorist group

Friday, May 23, 2014

Ghosts of Prejudice I

          There have been times and places when all human beings were equal. Sadly, such places and times are few and far apart. Yet, in many of those eras when humans were far too unequal, there was no common belief that humans are born inherently less than others- just a lingering belief that that was the way things should be, and always had been. We live in such a time. I now present to you the first in a series of short posts I will write about prejudices in our world today, why they came to be, and ponder why they still haunt us. 
Adam and Eve by Titian

Sexy/Pure: The Female Story

          Today, females are generally expected to be "pure" in order to be accepted. So-called sluts are viewed as the exception, not the rule, and abstinence is encouraged by many who see themselves as patriarchs. Yet, if we look into the past, it doesn't seem to have always been that way. 
          For starters, we have the bible. It's an obvious culprit- an ancient book (I'm not here to dispute whether God wrote it or not, we all can acknowledge that it's old) that is still regularly consulted. Although its readers may have good intentions, its sheer age makes it a perfect preservation site for outdated prejudices. 
          Looking at the very beginning of the bible, to the tale of Adam and Eve, it is obvious that Eve is portrayed as the impure one. It's she who submits to temptation, therefore "sin", and takes that fruit from the snake. Adam is good and upright even after his ejection from Eden, whereas Eve is the first sinner of the pair, a fallen woman. If this truly was the beginning of humankind, the portrayal of Eve was no good omen for women of the future. 
           In Greek mythology, we hear even more cries shouting that women are the slaves of desire. One story depicts Zeus and Hera, king and queen of the Olympian gods, respectively, arguing over who possessed more capacity for lust and pleasure: man or woman. Eventually, the pair consulted Tiresias, a man who had once been turned into a woman. He reported that women were ten times as lustful as men. (Hera blinded him in rage at this, as she wasn't the most merciful of the Goddesses.)
           Many other examples can be found throughout history of women being seen as uncontrollable sex-fiends: court records, literature, mythology, etc. Try finding some of your own information if you like- it's all out there. At some point, though, there was a change. Something happened that turned a woman from a "lustful animal" to a "pure angel". Our best guess is, it began partially with the Christian church. 
          Now, this isn't to say that the change was immediately, inherently bad. Church officials, when they began painting this image of the holy and innocent female, probably thought they were doing women a favor by giving ladies of status a more noble standard to hold themselves up against. Over time, the idea caught hold, and soon the tables were turned- the untrue stereotype of men being pure and upright while women were tainted and wild had turned into the untrue stereotype of men being slaves to their instincts, with women seen as innocent. 
          Wait- there's something strange here. Before, females were kept out of leadership positions because they were seen as sinners, more susceptible to temptation, whereas men were strong enough to keep their emotions at bay. Now, women must live up to an untainted standard, the phrase "boys will be boys" has fully integrated itself into the English language, the good, obedient wife is our societal ideal, and victim-blaming is common in rape scenarios. Despite this turnaround, women are still seen or treated as inferior by many. This switching may seem ridiculous, but with a bit of common sense, anyone can see that it exists. The question is, why? 

-Lily



Sources: Encyclopedia Britannica, the Book of Genesis

Monday, January 20, 2014

Pink vs. Blue

          So, you know those superstores/supermarkets/big-box stores that sell everything from produce to appliances to their own cheap clothing lines? Chances are, you probably have one near your house. They're everywhere in America and other first world countries now, and few people buy the basic necessities anywhere else. It's cheap, it's low-priced, and did I mention that it's affordable? I can't deny the convenience of shopping at supermarkets, but there's one thing that I definitely hate having to buy there: toys.
          Maybe it's my baby cousin's birthday and I'm shopping for a present, so shopping cart at the ready, I head towards the toy section. The instant I get there, something stands out. There are two toy aisles- and they're very clearly divided. There's the pink section full of Barbie dolls, princess tiaras, etc, all underneath a pink sign that says "Girls". Then there's the blue section, where there are action figures, foam swords, and a big sign that says "Boys." There's such a clear barrier, a line that you're not supposed to cross. It's feminine OR masculine, Pink vs. Blue. Why does it have to be that way? Sure, the majority of boys and girls probably enjoy the toys in the boy and girl sections most, respectively, but why limit them both to only girly and only manly? The most well rounded people usually know how to keep a good balance of each, and by making the two sections exclusive, stores only support our Pink vs. Blue society. Not only is it not healthy to promote this to small children, it's unfair. So next time you're around a younger friend or family member, just remember not to help promote the sexist attitudes that start to affect small children the minute they learn to speak. 

I couldn't find any royalty free images that were relevant to this post, so here's a picture of my dog a few days after he was born. You're welcome.